science fiction author, beatmaker, against fascism

Author: J.D. Moyer Page 3 of 105

J.D. Moyer is a science fiction author and electronic music producer from Oakland, California.

I’m Giving You Permission to NOT Make Short Form Videos

Short-form videos (including TikTok, YouTube shorts, etc.) are the new ultra-processed food of the attention space. Bite-sized, super-engaging, effortless to consume, short-form videos melt your brain like artificially flavored bright-orange cheese puffs melt in your mouth. Zero nutritional value, and you’re left wanting more. Might as well eat the whole bag.

The first analogy I thought of was crack cocaine, but short-form video isn’t quite that addictive, and doesn’t ruin lives. It’s just another entertainment medium. And for some, it’s potentially useful. If you’re a DIY creator (author, illustrator, musician, dancer, whatever), you can use short-form video to promote your work with great effectiveness. If you’re willing and able to consistently create consistent content (there’s a reason for the two “consistents”), there’s a good chance you can leverage a zero-dollar marketing budget into massive exposure.

But one does not simply “make short form video.” There’s an art to it, like anything. To fit expectations and get views, the content needs to be engaging (funny, surprising or shocking, generally clickbaity) and presented in narrow bandwidth of narrative formats. You don’t need much equipment beyond a smartphone to get started, but you do need at least a rudimentary understanding of lighting, focus, framing, depth of field, editing, and other film-making concepts. And of course it helps if you’re young and/or good-looking and/or affable and/or funny, and enjoy being in front of the camera.

And you’re going to need ideas. Lots of ideas. But the ideas can’t be that different from one another. For the various algorithms to pick up your content and share it widely, your short-form videos will need to appeal to a narrow demographic. They should all be produced on a similar topic with a similar style, the narrower the better. Thus the second “consistent” above.

Does all this sound like great fun, an intriguing challenge? If so, you may be a great candidate for creating and sharing short-form video content to promote your work (or whatever other reason appeals to you). The more power to you!

But to me, and I’m guessing you (since you clicked on this post), it sounds like a huge pain in the ass. It sounds like a whole lot of work with potentially zero payoff. Who has time for all that? We’d rather invest our precious free time into making good (and maybe great) art, right?

The Harsh Reality of Art as a Market Product

Any kind of creative endeavor is both difficult and rewarding. The difficult part is making anything halfway decent, something that doesn’t make you cringe when the object of your creation impacts your physical senses. You have great taste (or at least great enthusiasm) for art; that’s why you started to make your own in the first place. But when you compare your own early efforts to the masters and geniuses you admire, you quickly realize that your own work sucks. So you persist and hone your skills, for years or even decades, and eventually reach a point when you’ve created something you’re proud of. You’re on top of the world!

What now?

Friends or family might suggest that you sell your work, or at least “put it out there.” Submit it, publish it, promote it. If you follow that advice, even a little bit, then your art is now a market product. Gatekeepers will accept or reject it. Consumers will buy it, or not. Tastemakers will pay attention to your work and talk about it, or not. Your work will be judged, commented on, and reviewed, sometimes harshly. Or worse, totally ignored.

It’s valid to create just for the sake of creating. Don’t turn your hobby into a job, they say, and it’s good advice. Expressing yourself creatively is usually good for your mental health, and you can simply share your work with your family and friends, completely safe from market forces and the opinions of strangers.

It’s also valid to put your work out there, to release it in some way, and then basically just hope for the best. No marketing, no hustle. Hope that somebody influential comes across your work and promotes it for you. That can actually work! That happened to me early in my music career, and it changed my life. John Digweed found a used Jondi & Spesh vinyl record at a record store in Berkeley, started playing it out, and eventually put it on his compilation that sold hundreds of thousands of copies. That break gave us the clout to release music on dozens of respected labels, to make music for video games and advertisements, to license our music to TV shows, and to start our own record label.

But in this day and age, there are millions of both traditionally and self-published releases every day. It’s more likely than ever that your work will be ignored and buried by the onslaught of newer releases if you don’t have an effective marketing plan.

You know all this. That’s why you’ve been considering making short form videos, and are perhaps dreading the prospect.

What’s the Alternative?

I’ve been experimenting with marketing for years. Mostly in the music space, through our record label. I’ve thrown plenty of money down the drain and learned a great deal about what doesn’t work. When we do have success with a release, at times it feels random. It’s easy to get discouraged and give up on marketing efforts altogether.

But I’ve persisted in trying to learn more about the space. It’s a fascinating problem, and if we can solve it, we can potentially make a living via our art. Or at least turn our creative endeavor into a lucrative side hustle.

So in terms of marketing, what works, and what doesn’t?

There’s no easy answer. The question is too big. It’s equivalent to “What’s the best way to earn money?” It depends on your skill set, the economy, your health and energy, and so many other factors.

But generally, it’s good advice to choose a marketing medium that you don’t hate. Just like you wouldn’t (or at least shouldn’t) choose a career that you hate, even if it paid well.

One useful metric is “Do you think about it in the shower?” If short-form video ideas spring to mind when hot water is pounding on your back, then maybe you should be posting on TikTok. That definitely doesn’t happen to me. But sometimes I do think of blog posts in shower. So this blog is my main “social media” channel.

What do you obsess on? What kind of promotional medium matches your natural wellspring of ideas?

Do that.

The Three Consistencies

I’ve had releases or projects get wildly popular a few times. Sometimes it’s pure luck–like a world-famous DJ finding my track in the used bin.

But in every case this “luck” has been preceded by three factors:

  1. Consistent quality
  2. Consistent content (staying within genre/topic/niche)
  3. Consistent release schedule

Easier said than done. Personally, I feel that I’m decent at quality control, pretty bad at staying within genre/topic, and mediocre at regular releases.

But times when I’ve managed to wrangle all three have been magic. This blog, for example, when I was writing consistently about health topics, posting multiple times a week. I was getting thousand of daily views, interview requests, and even a TV appearance for one of my 30-day experiments. It was a good run. Eventually I started to feel uncomfortable writing about health topics, given my complete lack of medical credentials. So I mostly stopped posting about health, and readership quickly fell off. But the formula worked.

Back in the late nineties my music and business partner Spesh started to host a weekly electronic music happy hour at an art gallery. I thought it would probably lose money as a project, but reluctantly hopped on board when his other partner dropped out. Week after week, we hosted this small party, curating music at 111 Minna from 5-9pm every Wednesday. Within a few years we had lines around the block and were written up in European guidebooks, “what to do in San Francisco.” The party ran for nearly fifteen years and was a wild success. Part of that was that the vibe of our party matched the zeitgeist of the time, when electronic music felt cutting edge, the internet was new, and San Francisco was experiencing its first “dot-com” boom. But the other part of the success was the three consistencies.

I’d love to be able to provide an example with my fiction writing. But being only traditionally published, I’ve never had much control over my release schedule, and its never been consistent. Which is one reason why I probably need to establish a self-publishing pipeline at some point to complement traditionally published releases. While it’s always possible for a one-off or debut release to become a massive hit, when I look around the author marketplace and see who is succeeding massively, they’re all consistent in terms of quality, topic/genre, and regular releases.

But wait, weren’t we talking about marketing efforts? Well, the same principles apply. If you’re publishing a newsletter to promote your books, it should be consistently good, with a consistent format, published at consistent intervals. With that formula, it’s impossible to NOT build an audience.

It’s simple. but it’s not easy. Consistency requires effort and planning. And it doesn’t guarantee success. But triple consistency does guarantee the best chance of your work connecting with its compatible and interested audience, if that audience exists.

Next up: Why You Shouldn’t Promote to Your Family and Friends

If You’re Looking for an Alternative to Nancy Pelosi…

Yesterday I got the chance to meet Saikat Chakrabarti, who’s running against Nancy Pelosi in California’s 11th congressional district. He has my vote for the following reasons:

  • I agree with the vast majority of his policies, which focus on affordable housing and healthcare, building a clean economy, and ending corruption in Congress.
  • He’s relatively young (39) and is thinking about what the next 30 years of democracy can look like.
  • He’s not afraid to call out the complacency and cowardice in the Democratic party, and to stand up for systemic change, even if it means rocking the boat.
  • He’s a flexible, nuanced thinker, who rejects false dichotomies (for example, we can expand state capacity AND make government more efficient–it’s not one or the other).

Some random observations:

  • His name is pronounced “shoy-kot” (more or less), which is the Bengali pronunciation of the name.
  • He’s independently wealthy from a startup (engineer #2 at Stripe). I don’t hold this against him at all, as it allows him to fund a campaign entirely free of corporate PAC money, AND he’s in favor of a wealth tax on people like himself.
  • He’s approachable, down-to-earth, and has a good sense of humor.
  • He’s originally from Texas.
  • He campaigned for Bernie Sanders, and was AOC’s campaign manager, and later, chief of staff.
  • While just as articulate and principled as Bernie and AOC, I could see Saikat being a less polarizing figure, simply because he is so personable and solutions-focused.

New Music Release, and Writing Update

MOMU, my breakbeat project with Mark Musselman, has a new release out on Beatport. From our publicist:

The release glides open with Momu’s original, subtly dissolving you into a rich tapestry of vivid harmonies and instrumental layers before ushering you into a sophisticated downtempo breakbeat groove – with the enveloping melodies modulating around it perpetually. This latest contribution from Momu further cements the duo’s status as one of the industry’s most diverse and artistically unlimited acts, capable of shaping timeless electronica with succinct nods to on-trend sonic nuances and a new-age feel.

The release is also available on Bandcamp with a second, alternative alias_j remix exclusive to that site.

Writing Update

TBH, I’m in the midst of a publishing drought. My most recent novel and short story were both published in 2021. But it’s not for lack of writing or submitting.

More than two years ago, I had a novella accepted by The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction. Unfortunately, that particular publication has been in a slump, with a dearth of recent issues and apparent financial difficulties. So my novella has yet to see the light of day. However, F&SF was recently acquired, so there’s still hope.

Publishing troubles aside, I’ve been busy. Since 2021 I’ve completed two screenplays, three novels, and half a dozen short stories. Some of those works still need revision, but some are currently in submission. Something will get the green light eventually, and you’ll be among the first to hear about it.

The recent explosion in AI slop “writing” has made things very difficult for editors who accept unsolicited fiction submissions. As a result, submission windows have tightened, and keeping track of which magazines are open for what kind of stories is practically a part-time job. But I’ve finally got some systems in place so that I’m getting my work out there again.

Wish me luck!

Four Types of Power, Revisited (a political framework)

I’m still trying to understand why the United States has taken such a hard, apparently sudden turn towards authoritarianism.

It’s not a new concern for anyone who’s been paying attention. Back in 2011, during Obama’s first term, I wrote about the rise of fascism in the United States. The context was Occupy Wall Street, a major protest against extreme wealth inequality. At the time I hypothesized that a right-wing reactionary movement was much more likely than any kind of leftist revolution. I pointed to trends like increased secret surveillance of private citizens, war profiteering, the use of prison camps and torture, scapegoating immigrants, and ever-increasing wealth inequality.

And shit, I was right.

The same year, I wrote a blog post entitled Four Types of Power. The idea was simple: divide the use of power according to two axes, creating four quadrants:

  • coercive power (threat or use of violence or other harm, force, “power over”) vs. non-coercive power (creative/attractive/persuasive power, “power to”)
  • zero-sum contexts (closed systems) vs. non-zero-sum contexts (open systems)

The model describes four quadrants of power. In a societal/geopolitical context, the four quadrants could be described as:

  • Authoritative (coercive, closed systems)
  • Extractive (coercive, open systems)
  • Competitive (non-coercive, closed systems)
  • Innovative (non-coercive, open systems)

My thinking has evolved since 2011. When I first conceived of this model, I had strong negative value judgements about the authoritative and extractive power quadrants. The most egregious abuses of power (like slavery and environmental destruction) certainly exist within these quadrants. But I’ve come to accept that any functioning society needs some use of authoritative and extractive power in order to survive. Like any liberal person with a decent amount of empathy, I’ve tried to consider if and how a society could function without the threat of violence against its own citizens. In 2013 I imagined something like a “citizenship score” could be an alternative to tossing people in jail. I was slightly horrified when the Chinese government implemented the Social Credit System the following year, not as an alternative to incarceration, but as more of a Black Mirror-like dystopian citizen surveillance program. But not totally dissimilar to my own idea, which made me question my own judgment.

Vandals (can be resisted)

Lately my mental cope regarding the current political situation has been to think of it as “the horribleness” and then do my best to briefly forget about it and go about my life. A few times a day Kia and I will yell horrible headlines from our respective home offices and agree on how horrible they are. Not very functional, admittedly. Definitely not resistance, which I aspire to.

I know there’s more I could be doing. And I’m gearing up to it. But the first step is trying to understand what happened (and is happening) to our country.

My current model of reality looks something like this: Trump and his ilk won not only because of their tried-and-true strategy of blaming economic problems on immigrants (along with a big dose of fear-mongering and race-baiting), not only because they probably rigged vote-counting machines in key counties, but also because Democrats failed to sufficiently emphasize economic issues, focused too much on identity politics, and basically ignored the crisis in Gaza. That, and many U.S. voters get the “ick” when they think of Democrats and progressives because of performative virtue signaling and cultural elitism.

So that covers what happened, more or less. Trump didn’t win because half the country is terribly racist, hates women, or likes the idea of a dictator/king president. While I still think Trump voters were deeply misled and deeply wrong, I can at least understand why many of them voted that way. I blame Russian and Facebook disinformation as much as I blame any individual Trump voter.

As for what is happening, that’s been harder to wrap my head around. There’s a plan, Project 2025, and they’re trying to roll it out as quickly as possible. But what’s the real goal, the end game? Save the US taxpayer money? Destroy the state apparatus and replace it with a corporate structure where the CEO/dictator/king has absolute power? “Take back” the national identity so that white Anglo Christian culture is completely dominant and unopposed? Destroy the welfare state (and probably the middle class along with it), once and for all? Become actual Nazis/fascists and put all their enemies in camps? Invade Canada? Invade Greenland? All of the above?

Page 3 of 105

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén