science fiction author, beatmaker, against fascism

Category: Alternative Economics Page 1 of 6

How to Destroy Fascism from the Comfort of Your Own Home

The reigning administration and its most rabid supporters can’t be shamed and can’t be reasoned with. We’ve learned that. Watching clear video evidence of a citizen being murdered for defending a woman who was assaulted, the conservative talking point is “Well, you shouldn’t bring a gun to a protest.” Alex Pretti had a permit for his holstered firearm, and open carry is legal in Minnesota. Pretti was executed, probably because he was defending a woman, reminding the ICE goons what honorable behavior looks like. They were triggered, lost control of their emotions, and murdered him. But MAGA is in too deep to see with their own eyes.

Also, the chaotic evil violence is part of Stephen Miller’s playbook. Murder citizens until they retaliate violently. Then invoke the Insurrection Act, call off the election, and advance the Fourth Reich (Corporate Rule). They’re so unpopular at this point, it’s the only way they can maintain power. They know it and they’re saying it out loud (imagine a link to Curtis Yarvin’s blog here).

I’m all for showing up at No Kings marches, and for liberals exercising 2A. But the most effective way to fight U.S. fascism and the billionaire tech Nazis who support it is much easier. Destroy them the same way we destroyed apartheid in South Africa.

Make them poorer.

The thing is, we don’t even have to bankrupt them. They absolutely cannot tolerate being even a tiny bit poorer. For the obscenely rich, two percent poorer is a really bad day. Five percent poorer is a fucking emergency–they’re calling Trump on his personal mobile to ask him what the fuck he’s going to do about it. Any poorer than that and they’re running for their bunkers and safe rooms, hitting red buttons, activating whatever insane contingency plans they have that probably involve private jets, islands, and underground kale farms. They just can’t handle it.

So how do we do it?

If You’re Looking for an Alternative to Nancy Pelosi…

Yesterday I got the chance to meet Saikat Chakrabarti, who’s running against Nancy Pelosi in California’s 11th congressional district. He has my vote for the following reasons:

  • I agree with the vast majority of his policies, which focus on affordable housing and healthcare, building a clean economy, and ending corruption in Congress.
  • He’s relatively young (39) and is thinking about what the next 30 years of democracy can look like.
  • He’s not afraid to call out the complacency and cowardice in the Democratic party, and to stand up for systemic change, even if it means rocking the boat.
  • He’s a flexible, nuanced thinker, who rejects false dichotomies (for example, we can expand state capacity AND make government more efficient–it’s not one or the other).

Some random observations:

  • His name is pronounced “shoy-kot” (more or less), which is the Bengali pronunciation of the name.
  • He’s independently wealthy from a startup (engineer #2 at Stripe). I don’t hold this against him at all, as it allows him to fund a campaign entirely free of corporate PAC money, AND he’s in favor of a wealth tax on people like himself.
  • He’s approachable, down-to-earth, and has a good sense of humor.
  • He’s originally from Texas.
  • He campaigned for Bernie Sanders, and was AOC’s campaign manager, and later, chief of staff.
  • While just as articulate and principled as Bernie and AOC, I could see Saikat being a less polarizing figure, simply because he is so personable and solutions-focused.

Free To Live, Pay To Party

I’m taking a break from my consulting work next week to make music. I’m calling it “Beat Week”. I haven’t even worked out the details yet, but I’m planning on writing multiple music sketches a day, brushing off the studio rust, and hopefully creating some great grooves.

I’m fortunate and privileged enough to be able to do this. 65% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, with no appreciable savings, and can’t afford to pursue their creative whims, impulses toward social service, or other non-income-generating pursuits.

But it doesn’t have to be this way. The majority of people are working too much, with too little time to relax and play, because of massive wealth inequality. With a minor wealth tax, we could afford universal healthcare and free education for everyone. These two benefits alone would ease so much suffering, improve mental and physical health outcomes, generate more free time, and raise our national happiness.

As a society, we don’t have to choose between corruption-riddled communism or exploitation-based capitalism as our only two economic options.

There are literally an infinite number of economic models we can choose from.

Free to Live, Pay to Party

What if, as a citizen, you could count on the following services being provided to you and your family, regardless of your economic means?

  • Healthcare, including preventive, medical treatments, vision and dental
  • Education, from early childhood to PhD
  • Emergency services, including fire and police
  • Libraries, parks, and other public facilities
  • Local transportation
  • Basic internet and phone service

We already get some of those, so it’s not too hard to imagine, right?

Suddenly life is easier. You don’t have to worry about going bankrupt if you get sick. You have no student loans to pay back. You don’t have to own a car. If you want to live a simple, inexpensive life, that’s available to you.

What if, in addition to the services above, your municipality or region enacted policies to encourage abundant supply (and thus lower cost) of the following? Or perhaps even provided these for free for all citizens?

  • Non-luxury housing
  • Staple healthful plant food production (fruits, vegetables, beans, nuts, etc.)

An affordable roof over your head, and plenty to eat. No more homelessness. No more tents lining the streets of every major city.

But what if you want to live large? What if you want to wear designer clothes and drive a sports car and eat sushi prepared by the finest chefs? What if you want to eat a big steak every night and drive a giant oversized truck? What if you want bionic legs to run really fast?

Get a job, slacker! Or start a business. And use your paycheck and/or profits to pay for the following:

  • Restaurant dining and luxury foods
  • Air/space travel and tourism
  • Cosmetic body modifications
  • Cybernetic enhancements
  • Life extension treatments beyond the average natural maximum (~100 years)
  • Luxury items (fancy watches, yachts, designer clothing, etc.)
  • Drugs, alcohol, and other non-essential consumables
  • Entertainment media and experiences
  • Non-essential personalized services
  • Mansions and other large/luxurious domiciles
  • Computers and electronics

Would this “free to live, pay to party” model work in reality? Would there be sufficient motivation for people to work? Could the government afford to pay for all these services?

Yes and yes. All basic income experiments demonstrate little to no drop in personal productivity. And a 2% wealth tax on the ultra-rich would generate between and 2 and 4 trillion USD per year. Right now American’s spend between three and four trillion per year on healthcare, but that includes huge corporate profits for private healthcare providers. Other countries provide excellent healthcare to their citizens for a fraction of this cost, and there’s no reason we can’t do the same.

Automation and robotics are creating real wealth and efficiencies. The problem is all that wealth “naturally” trickles up if we don’t intervene. A minor wealth tax fixes this. We don’t all have to work this hard.

It’s not communism! Under this model, private ownership still exists, as does a reasonably regulated free market. And even with a minor wealth tax, the ultra-rich stay ultra-rich (and probably keep getting richer). Sure, it’s wealth redistribution, but only a little bit of wealth redistribution. And there’s no cap on how rich an individual can get.

But the rest of us get to work a fifteen or twenty hour work week, spend as much time with our family and friends as we want, take multiple vacations per year, and live rich, varied, free lives. We get medical care when we need it, and we go to school as long as we want without incurring debt. Even if we’re not rich.

Does all this sound too good to be true? If it does, you don’t understand how extreme wealth inequality is in this country. Yes, a 2% wealth tax pays for it all, even if we maintain our ridiculous military budget at current levels.

How Does Human Consciousness Change?

What happens when a society organizes itself so that basic life becomes affordable for everyone?

  • We all relax a little more
  • We all feel less fear and desperation
  • Maybe we’re all a little more charitable toward our neighbors
  • We don’t feel resentful, because everyone gets the same deal (no means testing)
  • We have enough time to sleep, exercise, prepare healthful food, and socialize, making us healthier and happier

Just spend five minutes imagining your life under this kind of socioeconomic system. It’s completely within our grasp.

Free to live, pay to party.

A Solarpunk Manifesto

The other day I found A Solarpunk Manifesto in my inbox, thanks to Joe Stech and his News Refinery newsletter.

I was vaguely aware of solarpunk as a genre, associating it with progressive technological optimism, an alternative to both dystopian science fiction and steampunk. But I’d never read any attempt to describe it explicitly.

Reading the manifesto, my general reaction was yes. Count me in for science fiction as activism, post-scarcity, post-capitalism, post-hierarchical society, and the whole shebang.

While I’ve never described the Reclaimed Earth series as solarpunk, the Ringstation Coalition culture checks all of the boxes. So do aspects of my novelette The Icelandic Cure, and many of my short stories.

So yeah, I guess I’m a solarpunk author, at least in part.

Here’s the manifesto in full, shared via Creative Commons license:

More Thoughts on Crypto (as a N00b)

I enjoyed this post on Reddit yesterday:There’s plenty to worry about when investing in cryptocurrency. Is it even an investment? Or is it simply hyped-up gambling?

About a month ago I opened accounts with Coinbase and Kraken. Kia and I each put in $1000. In that time our money has doubled, and Dogecoin went up tenfold (I sold half at the pre-SNL peak).

It’s an absolutely insane market. A major crash is all but guaranteed. There’s a significant chance one of the four coins we’re invested in (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Doge, and Cardano) will fall out of favor and plummet in value to zero or close to it.

On the other hand, I wouldn’t be surprised if holding those coins for five years (and possibly buying the dips) yields an average gain of 50% or more annually. That sure beats a 3% bond yield or a .05% “high-interest” savings account.

Here’s my current approach and thinking:

Page 1 of 6

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén